How much a photo can be altered aesthetically and still be within the bounds of reasonable ethical standards?
IF the intention of the person in the image is distorted, I feel that it would be unethical. Even if the artist was making an aesthetic adjustment, I think it is unreasonable to alter the perception of said person in the image. For example, if there was an image of a female that was taken at an unflattering angle, the artist may distort her figure to look thinner. This does not seem unethical in certain contexts. However, if the image was suppose to be used as a real life example of a woman's figure for a poster titled "body awareness", then the adjustment alters the intent of the person being photographed, which in my opinion is unethical.
Without editing, photos can still be taken in a certain context with an artistic perspective or an aesthetically pleasing view. There are examples when this can be unethical as well. For instance, if the photographer is capturing images of a forest that has an abundance of waste and habitat degradation but decided to only capture areas in which these non-aesthetic aspects are removed, then the image is misleading. This does not necessarily mean the image is unethical depending on what context it is used in. If this image was used in a scientific paper representing a forest that is unharmed by waste and deforestation, then I would consider it unethical.
Ethics are a set of rules that we invent that define what we think is good and bad. The dictionary says ethics are "a set of moral principles or values" and that ethical means "conforming to accepted professional standards of conduct".
Ethics and Art have a complex relationship. Whether or not an artistic piece is unethical or not is dependent on the intent of the artist as well as the context in which the photo is used.
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Learning from Technology: CLT
I have been to CLT before, but this past visit really added a layer of depth to what I previously knew about the advanced forms of technology this wonderful facility offers to trinity students and faculty. Every time I come to CLT I tell myself "Im going to start doing homework here", because the computers are really sweet! One of the most exciting new additions to the CLT supply are the 3-D printers and scanners. The amount of potential for creative ideas and applied use of these printers are endless. I am really excited to get more involved with this technology in the future for both classes and personal use.
Thanks again Gregory!
Photo Manipulation: Distortion and Enhancement
pt(I) - Distortion
Coincidentally, I had been discussing our countries' criminal justice system with my roomate and the infamous O.J. Simpson trail came up. Although we put minors in jail for life for manslaughter, we let famous celebrities off scott-free...
Coincidentally, I had been discussing our countries' criminal justice system with my roomate and the infamous O.J. Simpson trail came up. Although we put minors in jail for life for manslaughter, we let famous celebrities off scott-free...
The above photos are both mug shots of O.J. Simpson the night of his arrest. On the left in Newsweek, the image is not edited. On the right, it was manipulated to make O.J.'s face darker with a vingette edge around the image-- adding a shadowy effect. These subtle dark addtions add to the overall give off a troubling and guilty look. OJ becomes the shadow of the night that he "allegedly" killed his wife. The photo editor probably believed that O.J. was guilty and felt that the picture needed some darkening and menacing effects. Although some digital alteration can be harmful to the person in the photo, I have no sympathy for O.J. and his mugshot in this situation.
pt(II)- Enhancement
I really enjoyed watching this short artsy clip on photo manipulatino. Oringinally a picture of a Burlesque dancer, the photo becomes something quite astonishing and supernatural at the end of the clip. The addition of galaxies and stars as the backdrop as well as the brightly colored hair and lips transforms this photo into something out-of-this-world!
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
Avoiding Artificiality
Situation A.
A first-year medical student in California whose
personal blog is hosted by a large weblog content provider posts explicit
directions on facilitating an assisted suicide in the interest of “serving the
rights of competent, terminally ill adults.” Is this legal? Is it
ethical? A teenager in another state who is being treated for depression reads
the post and succumbs to a fatal, self-administered overdose of drugs,
crediting the blogger for “helping her do it right” in her last note to her
family. Who is responsible for the tragedy? The teenager herself?
The medical student? The weblog content provider for allowing the blog content
to be posted? The parents for not monitoring their emotionally fragile child’s
Internet access closely enough? What, if any, crime has been committed and who
can and should be prosecuted?
Suicide is clearly not a matter of black and white, such as
many situations under the copyright law. If you torrent a song, you downloaded
it illegally and that is wrong. If you provide information on how to properly
kill yourself is that wrong? Intuitively I say yes. Then I step back. If I were
dying of stage 4 malignant cancer, how much longer would I want to be
around? Life seems to be about quality over quantity. If the situation is
reversed however, and this information gives a teenage girl the necessary tools
to end it all, this information is harmful. Then I step back even further. In
my generation, we have complete access to an abundance of information that connects
us to the global sphere. People everywhere are on the Internet voicing their
opinions on blogs, providing falsehoods on Wikipedia and exercising their
rights. With an exponential amount of voices and opinions, you are bound to
find the answer to life’s questions that you are looking for. Meaning, this
teenager could have just as easily researched a suicide-watch hotline online or
a site that gives helpful tips on how to deal with depression.
This is where my argument shifts. The information itself
that the teenager used to commit suicide is not inherently evil. It is on the
part of the medical student to state explicitly how the information should be
used (ex: this webpage is designed for terminally ill adults battling cancer). It also falls on the parent’s shoulders to
regulate how much time their daughter spends on the Internet as well as making
a daily human-to-human interaction with her. There are too many situations
where young adults feel disconnected and isolated and then look to the web to
find artificial relationships. It is also critical that schools begin to
address how to use the Internet at a young age. Understanding that not
everything you read is true is helpful when you are still absorbing everything
you hear and see. On a larger scale, the government needs to regulate what
citizens can and cannot put on the web. Too many sites provide false
information or justify acts that would be deemed unconstitutional.
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Excel Skills from Lynda
Lynda.com is a great resource for a quick tutorial on anything computer oriented. I have thoroughly enjoyed using this website to draw on for excel and word. I will most likely end up going through some of these tutorials in order to refresh on minute details before the midterm. I honestly have no complaints about lynda, shes awesome! I am so glad we are going over how to properly use excel because it is such a frequently used program in school as well as the workplace. Learning some essential skills will really go a long way. Whether you are using excel to collect profit data as economics major, or plotting graphs for a lab class excel is truly something every student needs to know.
Monday, September 23, 2013
Copyright Law: Black and White, with Shades of Uncertainty
The Debate
Copyright law is a form of "intellectual property" that allows for artists, authors and any individual with an idea to protect it, redistribute it and in many cases, make a profit from it. This makes an individual's work a sort of tangible mean of expression. Copyright is also said to incentivize creativity. Currently, Copyright is an evolving form of law in today's judicial system. When a person breaks copyright law, it is called copyright infringement. Not to be confused with plagerism, copyright infringement is taking or copying something without paying for it sufficiently, whereas plagerism is claiming authorship of a work that is not your own. There are many debates on whether or not something is technically not your own. One of the most interesting debates in this area is whether or not an artist doing a song cover of another artist is technically considered copyright infringement. So many up and coming artists become known through recreating or doing a take on a song created by someone else. Personally, I feel that information, art, and music are things that should be shared and recreated. I don't think torrenting music is the answer, but I would not consider a cover copyright infringement either. We must be able to find a happy medium to appreciate music and art without harming the creator in any way.
Copyright Quiz
Q:An elementary school transcribes the lyrics from the album "Cats" and puts it on as the school mini-musical. A teacher plays the music by ear on the piano and the students perform every song. There is no admission charge. This is legal.
A: False.
I was suprised to find out that schools cant use media or re-enact plays without the permission of the owner. Mistakenly, I considered this to be "fair use" but apparantly in this situation it isnt.
Copyright law is a form of "intellectual property" that allows for artists, authors and any individual with an idea to protect it, redistribute it and in many cases, make a profit from it. This makes an individual's work a sort of tangible mean of expression. Copyright is also said to incentivize creativity. Currently, Copyright is an evolving form of law in today's judicial system. When a person breaks copyright law, it is called copyright infringement. Not to be confused with plagerism, copyright infringement is taking or copying something without paying for it sufficiently, whereas plagerism is claiming authorship of a work that is not your own. There are many debates on whether or not something is technically not your own. One of the most interesting debates in this area is whether or not an artist doing a song cover of another artist is technically considered copyright infringement. So many up and coming artists become known through recreating or doing a take on a song created by someone else. Personally, I feel that information, art, and music are things that should be shared and recreated. I don't think torrenting music is the answer, but I would not consider a cover copyright infringement either. We must be able to find a happy medium to appreciate music and art without harming the creator in any way.
Copyright Quiz
Q:An elementary school transcribes the lyrics from the album "Cats" and puts it on as the school mini-musical. A teacher plays the music by ear on the piano and the students perform every song. There is no admission charge. This is legal.
A: False.
I was suprised to find out that schools cant use media or re-enact plays without the permission of the owner. Mistakenly, I considered this to be "fair use" but apparantly in this situation it isnt.
Copyright: Shades of Uncertainty by Hayley Sayrs is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
One's Self in a Spectrum
The self reflects life as life reflects the self.
Contrast.
Duality.
Light.
Dark.
The elements of living that we transcribe into art.
We are the colors of this spectrum called life.
Heavy rain and sun rays meeting at the perfect moment.
A rainbow.
A smile.
How do you make every day worth while?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


