Situation A.
A first-year medical student in California whose
personal blog is hosted by a large weblog content provider posts explicit
directions on facilitating an assisted suicide in the interest of “serving the
rights of competent, terminally ill adults.” Is this legal? Is it
ethical? A teenager in another state who is being treated for depression reads
the post and succumbs to a fatal, self-administered overdose of drugs,
crediting the blogger for “helping her do it right” in her last note to her
family. Who is responsible for the tragedy? The teenager herself?
The medical student? The weblog content provider for allowing the blog content
to be posted? The parents for not monitoring their emotionally fragile child’s
Internet access closely enough? What, if any, crime has been committed and who
can and should be prosecuted?
Suicide is clearly not a matter of black and white, such as
many situations under the copyright law. If you torrent a song, you downloaded
it illegally and that is wrong. If you provide information on how to properly
kill yourself is that wrong? Intuitively I say yes. Then I step back. If I were
dying of stage 4 malignant cancer, how much longer would I want to be
around? Life seems to be about quality over quantity. If the situation is
reversed however, and this information gives a teenage girl the necessary tools
to end it all, this information is harmful. Then I step back even further. In
my generation, we have complete access to an abundance of information that connects
us to the global sphere. People everywhere are on the Internet voicing their
opinions on blogs, providing falsehoods on Wikipedia and exercising their
rights. With an exponential amount of voices and opinions, you are bound to
find the answer to life’s questions that you are looking for. Meaning, this
teenager could have just as easily researched a suicide-watch hotline online or
a site that gives helpful tips on how to deal with depression.
This is where my argument shifts. The information itself
that the teenager used to commit suicide is not inherently evil. It is on the
part of the medical student to state explicitly how the information should be
used (ex: this webpage is designed for terminally ill adults battling cancer). It also falls on the parent’s shoulders to
regulate how much time their daughter spends on the Internet as well as making
a daily human-to-human interaction with her. There are too many situations
where young adults feel disconnected and isolated and then look to the web to
find artificial relationships. It is also critical that schools begin to
address how to use the Internet at a young age. Understanding that not
everything you read is true is helpful when you are still absorbing everything
you hear and see. On a larger scale, the government needs to regulate what
citizens can and cannot put on the web. Too many sites provide false
information or justify acts that would be deemed unconstitutional.
Its very sad that your friend committed suicide and I'm very sorry for it, but I really like your way of viewing it now. I appreciate that you look at life as a constant but beautiful challenge, that you are willing to take action.
ReplyDelete